Sunday, June 7, 2009

Who are these guys, anyway?

Last week, one of my students was quoting information he had found in various discussion groups on the internet as "source authority" for a discussion we were having about saxophone history. It troubled me greatly. Here's why:

Many people will believe anything they see written down. The source, or qualifications of the source, is rarey considered or investigated. I am forever amused (and disturbed) by the fact that many posters on the various discussion groups around the internet seemed to have just popped up on their own and are strictly self appointed in their expertise. They are experts and authorities simply because they say they are experts and authorities. They give not resume or background on themselves because it would expose them as the pathetic liars that they are. They sit in judgement of and pontificate at length on horns and equipment they have never played and about people they don't know anything about. Often, they fabricate stories out of thin air.

There's not a whole lot you can do about this sort of thing if you're the victim. Invariably,the expert in question will give themselves a cute internet name to conceal their real identity and lack of actual knowlege and experience. In my world, that's the first red flag. I like to know exactly and specifically who is providing me with information and opinions, and a little bit about their background and saxophone experience. I always hate it when I find out that one of these "experts" is actually thirteen years old and lives in a little town in Montana (no offense to the Big Sky Country, just a convenient example) and plays a thirty year old Bundy they inherited from their uncle Joe.

The only protection you have, if you desire to be protected, is to know a bit about who you are listening to. A real authority is published (not self published), has a recording history (sorry, self produced and distributed CD's not allowed here), and has an association with instrument manufacturers. Yes, the guys who make the horns do have a tendency to seek out people who actually know what they are talking about. Real experts almost always have a web site where they tell you a bit about themselves, and freely share a bit of their knowlege. Chances are they sell products or services with their name on them, and have been doing it for a while. Real deal guys tend to be chosen as endorsing artists and spokesmen for products you know. Yes, the makers of those products do have a tendency to check out their endorsers and usually use only people who can actually play and people who have made some contribution of note to the industry.

I guess it all gets down to what my momma told me: know who you are dealing with.

2 comments:

  1. So often these folk hide behind anonymity.

    Cloaked behind a made up name you can not tell if the person is a knowing scholar, a pimply prepubescent basement recluse, or an out & out internet troll.

    Basically the anonymous sources should be considered "interesting possibilities" but never as definitive sources of knowledge.

    The ones I really get a kick out of are product reviews by people who have never seen, much less owned the the product they are reviewing.

    Winston Smith, the anti-Hero of George Orwell's book "1984" said: "Sanity is not statistical.”

    In other words "the truth" is not something we can do a web poll - do diggs or a wiki - and find. It is existent as the truth independent of other noise.

    Cheers,

    Steve W

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steve,
    I love the infamous "they" claim, said, etc. I have read numerous posts on forums across the internet that claim you are the devil (of course, we both know this is true :-) But the posts are generally anonymous. Anyway, you are very correct--students, especially, can be so influenced by postings that rely upon anecdotal nonsense--this bothers me. I can generally determine who knows the acoustics of a saxophone, mouthpiece by their writings. But "less informed" students may not. Certain web forums have become dangerous breeding grounds of vast ignorance, and those same forums receive thousands of "hits" per day--this is dangerous. Students deserve better, and forums should be more careful about the posts they allow to be disseminated. I am guilty of having posted anonymously, and I am glad to have mentioned this so I can be more careful in the future.

    Best wishes,
    Ben

    ReplyDelete

You are welcome to comment on my posts. HOWEVER, be advised that all comments are moderated, and that I won't allow any comments that do not contain your real name and a verifiable email address. Please do not waste my time and yours with comments you know I will not allow.